On Window Managers and File System Browsers

My main work pc is a Lenovo X61 tablet running Ubuntu 9.10 (right now…).
This poses some restrictions on my choice of desktop environment. First of
all, I don’t want to spend too much of my 12.1″ screen on cruft.
Furthermore, as the system isn’t the fastest in the world, I need to be a bit
careful about how i spend my clock cycles and ram.
Finally, the computer being a tablet laptop, I tend to rotate the screen often.

The result is that I want a fast, light-weight window manager that can handle changes
in desktop dimensions dynamically, and I’ve tried a few, but I always return to
the Gnome desktop environment, but with the old Metacity window manager instead
of the new, fancy, Compiz-fusion.

I was using fluxbox for a while, and generally liked it. Configuring it wasn’t
too hard, but it took a while getting used to. However, it had trouble coping
with a rotating screen, and had to be restarted to cope with a change in
desktop dimensions. Not too much of a problem, though, as fluxbox supports
restarting without restarting X, which means that the running applications are
kept running.

Recently, I tried e17, and that too appealed to me. Configuration was even
easier than fluxbox, and it looks great. However, it kept crashing on me. This
might be because I was experimenting with a lot of modules, but it looked like
e17 really wanted me to use composition, which is a no-go due to hardware

File System Browser

But the thing that really keeps me coming back to Gnome is Nautilus, the file
system browser. And yes, I know I can use Nautilus with both Fluxbox and e17,
but there are a caveat to that. Nautilus has a preference for drawing a desktop
background and desktop icons on the desktop, which clashes somewhat with
the general consensus among alternative window managers that the main menu
should be accessed by a click on the desktop.

And yes, I know I can just run Nautilus with the --no-desktop
parameter, but it isn’t the same. I want Nautilus to draw the desktop
icons. So far, it has done the best job of it, compared to other solutions,
like the EFM module in e17 or custom icon applications for Fluxbox.

Some of the things I think Nautilus does better than EFM or Thunar (the
alternative window manager file browser of choice), is the context menu for
files. It presents the options I might want. All of them. And it allows me to
edit Samba shares right there in the GUI.

Some might call this (GUI) blasphemy, especially used in a Linux context, but
there is a reason for its popularity. It is easy! If I want to browse file
shares, doing it in a gui is a lot easer than digging around in command line
tools. Similar, if I want to set up a folder for sharing, clicking a few times
is easier than editing /etc/samba/smb.conf and restarting samba
manually. It is not that I don’t know how to mount a share on the command line,
it’s just not worth it.


So, in the end, I must accept that I cannot have fancy graphics on my laptop
due to hardware restrictions, and that I’m just too much in love with Nautilus
to replace it with Thunar.
BUT! If I should ever get around to run linux on a desktop computer, I would
love to experiment with especially Enlightenment again, as it shows a lot of
promise, perhaps configuring it so I could easily access Nautilus without it
capturing the desktop. Right now, however, I stick to my Gnome setup.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s